Dr. Pallotta’s talk “Adoption of Patient-Specific Rods in Adult Deformity Surgery” explains why and how to integrate pre-contoured, patient-specific rods (PSRs) into adult spinal deformity (ASD) practice, using both current evidence and his own case experience to frame their benefits and limits.
Core concept of patient-specific rods
-
Patient-specific rods are pre-bent based on 3D preoperative planning software to match each patient’s target spinopelvic parameters (SVA, PI–LL, PT) instead of being manually contoured in the OR.
-
The intended advantages are more accurate achievement of planned alignment, less intraoperative rod manipulation, potentially fewer notches and microcracks, and reduced surgeon fatigue and variability between operators.
Evidence overview he builds on
-
Systematic and narrative reviews now summarize 7–10 PSR series in ASD (roughly 300+ adult patients) showing consistent improvements in SVA and PI–LL, and more variable improvements in PT; some studies demonstrate good concordance between planned and achieved alignment, while others show only partial goal attainment.
-
A single-center case‑matched study comparing PSRs with traditional rods suggests PSRs improve the likelihood of reaching target PI–LL and overall spinopelvic alignment, without increasing complications, operative time or blood loss at short follow‑up.
How Dr. Pallotta uses PSRs in practice
-
In his adult deformity cases, PSRs are incorporated into a global plan that may also include SPOs, PSOs, or VCRs plus ALIF/LLIF/PLIF at key levels, with the rod shape designed around the desired final lumbar lordosis distribution and thoracic compensation.
-
He highlights that the technology is most valuable in complex, long‑segment corrections where subtle errors in rod bending can easily translate into under‑ or overcorrection, especially in multilevel osteotomy constructs.
-
Example cases typically show significant preoperative sagittal imbalance and PI–LL mismatch; postoperative films with PSRs demonstrate closer approximation to planned SVA < 40–50 mm and PI–LL mismatch < 10°, with corresponding improvements in pain and disability scores.
Limitations, learning curve, and patient selection
-
Dr. Pallotta emphasizes that PSRs do not replace sound deformity planning: poor target selection or mis‑located lordosis cannot be “fixed” by a perfectly bent rod.
-
He notes the need for reliable preoperative imaging, accurate registration of bony landmarks, and some flexibility intraoperatively, since real‑world correction often diverges slightly from the software model.
-
Cost, logistics (lead time for manufacturing), and the current lack of randomized head‑to‑head trials versus standard rods are discussed as reasons to reserve PSRs for well‑selected ASD patients rather than routine use in short fusions or mild deformities.